Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 41(02): 214-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701250
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Clinical Decision-Making in Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Diagnosis and Management

Evans R. Fernández Pérez
1   Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
,
Tilman L. Koelsch
2   Division of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
,
Paolo M. Leone
3   Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
,
Steve D. Groshong
4   Division of Pathology, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
,
David A. Lynch
2   Division of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
,
Kevin K. Brown
1   Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 April 2020 (online)

Preview

Abstract

This review provides an updated approach to the diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). The importance of using a multidisciplinary discussion to increase diagnostic and treatment confidence is emphasized. The role of Bayesian reasoning is highlighted throughout, underscoring the importance of hypothesis generation (differential diagnosis) and diagnostic test interpretation based on the probability of HP. Probability estimates of diagnostic certainty (i.e., a confident versus a working diagnosis) and treatment thresholds are carefully examined.

Therapeutically, beyond antigen avoidance and newly available antifibrotic therapy for patients with a progressive fibrosing phenotype; the role, timing, and expected response to anti-inflammatory therapy in individual patients are unanswered questions. Since the evidence and validation of testing generally performed during the diagnostic work-up and longitudinal monitoring of HP is feeble at best, the viewpoints discussed are not intended to resolve current controversies but rather to provide a conceptual framework for evaluating discordant information when evaluating and caring for patients with HP.